diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/birds.md | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/doc/birds.html | 1 |
2 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/birds.md b/doc/birds.md index 77811bf8..451f0455 100644 --- a/doc/birds.md +++ b/doc/birds.md @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ # BQN for birdwatchers +*There's now a [paper](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3520306.3534504) on this topic! Wild!* + Some people consider it reasonable to name [combinators](primitive.md#modifiers) after types of birds. [Here's](https://blog.lahteenmaki.net/combinator-birds.html) one compendium of such names, and [another](https://wiki.xxiivv.com/site/ornithodex.html) that lacks its obsessive completeness but makes up for it with [rambling accounts](https://wiki.xxiivv.com/site/logic.html) of imagined forests. There is something wrong with these people. Some of these birds are not even real. "Quixotic bird"? Have you not heard of a quail? Nonetheless, I don't judge such afflicted souls (certainly not publicly), and have provided this translation table to explain BQN in terms they can understand. | BQN | Bird 1 | 1 | Bird 2 | 2 | diff --git a/docs/doc/birds.html b/docs/doc/birds.html index 18a1389a..60415294 100644 --- a/docs/doc/birds.html +++ b/docs/doc/birds.html @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ </head> <div class="nav">(<a href="https://github.com/mlochbaum/BQN">github</a>) / <a href="../index.html">BQN</a> / <a href="index.html">doc</a></div> <h1 id="bqn-for-birdwatchers"><a class="header" href="#bqn-for-birdwatchers">BQN for birdwatchers</a></h1> +<p><em>There's now a <a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3520306.3534504">paper</a> on this topic! Wild!</em></p> <p>Some people consider it reasonable to name <a href="primitive.html#modifiers">combinators</a> after types of birds. <a href="https://blog.lahteenmaki.net/combinator-birds.html">Here's</a> one compendium of such names, and <a href="https://wiki.xxiivv.com/site/ornithodex.html">another</a> that lacks its obsessive completeness but makes up for it with <a href="https://wiki.xxiivv.com/site/logic.html">rambling accounts</a> of imagined forests. There is something wrong with these people. Some of these birds are not even real. "Quixotic bird"? Have you not heard of a quail? Nonetheless, I don't judge such afflicted souls (certainly not publicly), and have provided this translation table to explain BQN in terms they can understand.</p> <table> <thead> |