Allow clicking on header to get fragment link

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/docs/doc/train.html b/docs/doc/train.html
index b9c2f398..9675922c 100644
--- a/docs/doc/train.html
+++ b/docs/doc/train.html
@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@
   <title>BQN: Function trains</title>
 </head>
 <div class="nav">(<a href="https://github.com/mlochbaum/BQN">github</a>) / <a href="../index.html">BQN</a> / <a href="index.html">doc</a></div>
-<h1 id="function-trains">Function trains</h1>
+<h1 id="function-trains"><a class="header" href="#function-trains">Function trains</a></h1>
 <p>Trains are an important aspect of BQN's <a href="tacit.html">tacit</a> programming capabilities. In fact, a crucial one: with trains and the <a href="identity.html">identity functions</a> Left (<code><span class='Function'>⊣</span></code>) and Right (<code><span class='Function'>⊢</span></code>), a fully tacit program can express any explicit function whose body is a statement with <code><span class='Value'>𝕨</span></code> and <code><span class='Value'>𝕩</span></code> used only as arguments (that is, there are no assignments and <code><span class='Value'>𝕨</span></code> and <code><span class='Value'>𝕩</span></code> are not used in operands or lists. Functions with assignments may have too many variables active at once to be directly translated but can be emulated by constructing lists. But it's probably a bad idea). Without trains it isn't possible to have two different functions that each use both arguments to a dyadic function. With trains it's perfectly natural.</p>
 <p>BQN's trains are the same as those of Dyalog APL, except that Dyalog is missing the minor convenience of BQN's Nothing (<code><span class='Nothing'>·</span></code>). There are many Dyalog-based documents and videos on trains you can view on the <a href="https://aplwiki.com/wiki/Train">APL Wiki</a>.</p>
-<h2 id="2-train-3-train">2-train, 3-train</h2>
+<h2 id="2-train-3-train"><a class="header" href="#2-train-3-train">2-train, 3-train</a></h2>
 <p>Trains are an adaptation of the mathematical convention that, for example, two functions <code><span class='Function'>F</span></code> and <code><span class='Function'>G</span></code> can be added to get a new function <code><span class='Function'>F+G</span></code> that applies as <code><span class='Paren'>(</span><span class='Function'>F+G</span><span class='Paren'>)(</span><span class='Value'>x</span><span class='Paren'>)</span> <span class='Function'>=</span> <span class='Function'>F</span><span class='Paren'>(</span><span class='Value'>x</span><span class='Paren'>)</span><span class='Function'>+G</span><span class='Paren'>(</span><span class='Value'>x</span><span class='Paren'>)</span></code>. With a little change to the syntax, we can do exactly this in BQN:</p>
 <a class="replLink" title="Open in the REPL" target="_blank" href="https://mlochbaum.github.io/BQN/try.html#code=KOKKoivijL0pIOKGlTU=">↗️</a><pre>    <span class='Paren'>(</span><span class='Function'>⊢+⌽</span><span class='Paren'>)</span> <span class='Function'>↕</span><span class='Number'>5</span>
 ⟨ 4 4 4 4 4 ⟩
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
 "fcdeab"
 </pre>
 <p>The three functions <code><span class='Function'>∾⌽</span></code>, <code><span class='Nothing'>·</span><span class='Function'>∾⌽</span></code>, and <code><span class='Function'>∾</span><span class='Modifier2'>∘</span><span class='Function'>⌽</span></code> are completely identical: <a href="join.html#join">Join</a> of <a href="reverse.html">Reverse</a>. Why might we want <strong>three</strong> different ways to write the same thing? If we only want to define a function, there's hardly any difference. However, these three forms have different syntax, and might be easier or harder to use in different contexts. As we'll see, we can use <code><span class='Function'>∾</span><span class='Modifier2'>∘</span><span class='Function'>⌽</span></code> inside a train without parenthesizing it, and string <code><span class='Nothing'>·</span><span class='Function'>∾⌽</span></code> but not <code><span class='Function'>∾⌽</span></code> together with other trains. Let's look at how the train syntax extends to longer expressions.</p>
-<h2 id="longer-trains">Longer trains</h2>
+<h2 id="longer-trains"><a class="header" href="#longer-trains">Longer trains</a></h2>
 <p>Function application in trains, as in other contexts, shares the lowest precedence level with assignment. Modifiers and strands (with <code><span class='Ligature'>‿</span></code>) have higher precedence, so they are applied before forming any trains. Once this is done, an expression is a <em>subject expression</em> if it ends with a subject and a <em>function expression</em> if it ends with a function (there are also modifier expressions, which aren't relevant here). A train is any function expression with multiple functions or subjects in it: while we've seen examples with two or three functions, any number are allowed.</p>
 <p>Subject expressions are the domain of &quot;old-school&quot; APL, and just apply one function after another to a subject, possibly assigning some of the results (that's the top-level picture—anything can still happen within parentheses). Subjects other than the first appear only as left arguments to functions, which means that two subjects can't appear next to each other because the one on the left would have no corresponding function. Here's an example from the compiler (at one point), with functions and assignments numbered in the order they are applied and their arguments marked with <code><span class='Function'>«»</span></code>, and a fully-parenthesized version shown below.</p>
 <pre><span class='Value'>cn</span><span class='Gets'>←</span><span class='Value'>pi</span><span class='Function'>∾</span><span class='Value'>lt</span><span class='Gets'>←</span><span class='Function'>/</span><span class='Value'>𝕩</span><span class='Function'>≥</span><span class='Value'>ci</span><span class='Gets'>←</span><span class='Value'>vi</span><span class='Function'>+</span><span class='Value'>nv</span>
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
 <span class='Function'>⊢&gt;</span><span class='Paren'>(</span><span class='Number'>¯1</span><span class='Function'>»⌈</span><span class='Modifier'>`</span><span class='Paren'>)</span>
 </pre>
 <p>In a train, arguments alternate strictly with combining functions between them. Arguments can be either functions or subjects, except for the rightmost one, which has to be a function to indicate that the expression is a train. Trains tend to be shorter than subject expressions partly because to keep track of this alternation in a train of all functions, you need to know where each function is relative to the end of the train (subjects like the <code><span class='Number'>¯1</span></code> above only occur as left arguments, so they can also serve as anchors).</p>
-<h2 id="practice-training">Practice training</h2>
+<h2 id="practice-training"><a class="header" href="#practice-training">Practice training</a></h2>
 <p>The train <code><span class='Function'>⊢&gt;</span><span class='Number'>¯1</span><span class='Function'>»⌈</span><span class='Modifier'>`</span></code> is actually a nice trick to get the result of <a href="selfcmp.html#mark-firsts">Mark Firsts</a> <code><span class='Function'>∊</span><span class='Value'>𝕩</span></code> given the result of <a href="selfcmp.html#classify">Classify</a> <code><span class='Function'>⊐</span><span class='Value'>𝕩</span></code>, without doing another search. Let's take a closer look, first by applying it mechanically. To do this, we apply each &quot;argument&quot; to the train's argument, and then combine them with the combining functions.</p>
 <pre><span class='Paren'>(</span><span class='Function'>⊢</span> <span class='Function'>&gt;</span> <span class='Number'>¯1</span> <span class='Function'>»</span> <span class='Function'>⌈</span><span class='Modifier'>`</span><span class='Paren'>)</span> <span class='Value'>𝕩</span>
 <span class='Paren'>(</span><span class='Function'>⊢</span><span class='Value'>𝕩</span><span class='Paren'>)</span> <span class='Function'>&gt;</span> <span class='Paren'>(</span><span class='Number'>¯1</span><span class='Paren'>)</span> <span class='Function'>»</span> <span class='Paren'>(</span><span class='Function'>⌈</span><span class='Modifier'>`</span><span class='Value'>𝕩</span><span class='Paren'>)</span>
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
     <span class='Paren'>(</span><span class='Function'>⊢&gt;</span><span class='Number'>¯1</span><span class='Function'>»⌈</span><span class='Modifier'>`</span><span class='Paren'>)</span> <span class='Value'>sc</span>
 ⟨ 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 ⟩
 </pre>
-<h2 id="composing-trains">Composing trains</h2>
+<h2 id="composing-trains"><a class="header" href="#composing-trains">Composing trains</a></h2>
 <p>The example above uses a train with five functions: an odd number. Trains with an odd length are always composed of length-3 trains, and they themselves are composed the same way as subject expressions: an odd-length train can be placed in the last position of another train without parentheses, but it needs parentheses to go in any other position.</p>
 <p>But we also saw the length-2 train <code><span class='Function'>∾⌽</span></code> above. Even-length trains consist of a single function (<code><span class='Function'>∾</span></code>) applied to a function or odd-length train (<code><span class='Function'>⌽</span></code>); another perspective is that an even-length train is an odd-length train where the left argument of the final (leftmost) function is left out, so it's called with only a right argument. An even-length train <em>always</em> needs parentheses if it's used as one of the functions in another train. However, it can also be turned into an odd-length train by placing <code><span class='Nothing'>·</span></code> at the left, making the implicit missing argument explicit. After this it can be used at the end of an odd-length train without parentheses. To get some intuition for even-length trains, let's look at an example of three functions used together: the <a href="selfcmp.html#deduplicate">unique</a> (<code><span class='Function'>⍷</span></code>) <a href="order.html#sort">sorted</a> (<code><span class='Function'>∧</span></code>) <a href="arithmetic.html#additional-arithmetic">absolute values</a> (<code><span class='Function'>|</span></code>) of an argument list.</p>
 <a class="replLink" title="Open in the REPL" target="_blank" href="https://mlochbaum.github.io/BQN/try.html#code=4o234oinfCAz4oC/NOKAv8KvM+KAv8KvMuKAvzA=">↗️</a><pre>    <span class='Function'>⍷∧|</span> <span class='Number'>3</span><span class='Ligature'>‿</span><span class='Number'>4</span><span class='Ligature'>‿</span><span class='Number'>¯3</span><span class='Ligature'>‿</span><span class='Number'>¯2</span><span class='Ligature'>‿</span><span class='Number'>0</span>