From b18eea502ebf0616cd099cad7f1e9a5f38076560 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marshall Lochbaum Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 22:20:19 -0400 Subject: Link to combinatorylogic.com on birds page --- docs/doc/birds.html | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'docs') diff --git a/docs/doc/birds.html b/docs/doc/birds.html index 22f909eb..0a7168f2 100644 --- a/docs/doc/birds.html +++ b/docs/doc/birds.html @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
(github) / BQN / doc

BQN for birdwatchers

There's now a paper (download) on this topic! Wild!

-

Some people consider it reasonable to name combinators after types of birds. Here's one compendium of such names, and another that lacks its obsessive completeness but makes up for it with rambling accounts of imagined forests. There is something wrong with these people. Some of these birds are not even real. "Quixotic bird"? Have you not heard of a quail? Nonetheless, I don't judge such afflicted souls (certainly not publicly), and have provided this translation table to explain BQN in terms they can understand.

+

Some people consider it reasonable to name combinators after types of birds. They make lists like the Ornithodex or Lähteenmäki's comprehensive Combinator birds (naturally, there's a list for these lists). There is something wrong with these people. Some of these birds are not even real. "Quixotic bird"? Have you not heard of a quail? Nonetheless, I don't judge such afflicted souls (certainly not publicly), and have provided this translation table to explain BQN in terms they can understand.

-- cgit v1.2.3