From 65eef4fade5eb426dae01d480f383b8a30b23071 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marshall Lochbaum <mwlochbaum@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:06:02 -0400
Subject: Change "BQN / main" in header to "(github) / BQN"

---
 docs/implementation/kclaims.html | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'docs/implementation/kclaims.html')

diff --git a/docs/implementation/kclaims.html b/docs/implementation/kclaims.html
index 667ff0fa..4d028e6c 100644
--- a/docs/implementation/kclaims.html
+++ b/docs/implementation/kclaims.html
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
   <link href="../style.css" rel="stylesheet"/>
   <title>BQN: Wild claims about K performance</title>
 </head>
-<div class="nav"><a href="https://github.com/mlochbaum/BQN">BQN</a> / <a href="../index.html">main</a> / <a href="index.html">implementation</a></div>
+<div class="nav">(<a href="https://github.com/mlochbaum/BQN">github</a>) / <a href="../index.html">BQN</a> / <a href="index.html">implementation</a></div>
 <h1 id="wild-claims-about-k-performance">Wild claims about K performance</h1>
 <p>Sometimes I see unsourced, unclear, vaguely mystical claims about K being the fastest array language. It happens often enough that I'd like to write a long-form rebuttal to these, and a demand that the people who make these do more to justify them.</p>
 <p>This isn't meant to put down the K language! K is in fact the only APL-family language other than BQN that I would recommend without reservations. And there's nothing wrong with the K community as a whole. Go to <a href="https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/90748/the-k-tree">the k tree</a> and meet them! What I want to fight is the <em>myth</em> of K, which is carried around as much by those who used K once upon a time, and no longer have any connection to it, as by active users.</p>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3