From 65eef4fade5eb426dae01d480f383b8a30b23071 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marshall Lochbaum <mwlochbaum@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:06:02 -0400
Subject: Change "BQN / main" in header to "(github) / BQN"

---
 docs/doc/logic.html | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'docs/doc/logic.html')

diff --git a/docs/doc/logic.html b/docs/doc/logic.html
index ef42070d..2635814c 100644
--- a/docs/doc/logic.html
+++ b/docs/doc/logic.html
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
   <link href="../style.css" rel="stylesheet"/>
   <title>BQN Logic functions: And, Or, Not (also Span)</title>
 </head>
-<div class="nav"><a href="https://github.com/mlochbaum/BQN">BQN</a> / <a href="../index.html">main</a> / <a href="index.html">doc</a></div>
+<div class="nav">(<a href="https://github.com/mlochbaum/BQN">github</a>) / <a href="../index.html">BQN</a> / <a href="index.html">doc</a></div>
 <h1 id="logic-functions-and-or-not-also-span">Logic functions: And, Or, Not (also Span)</h1>
 <p>BQN retains the APL symbols <code><span class='Function'>∧</span></code> and <code><span class='Function'>∨</span></code> for logical <em>and</em> and <em>or</em>, and changed APL's <code><span class='Value'>~</span></code> to <code><span class='Function'>¬</span></code> for <em>not</em>, since <code><span class='Value'>~</span></code> looks too much like <code><span class='Modifier'>˜</span></code> and <code><span class='Function'>¬</span></code> is more common in mathematics today. Like J, BQN extends Not to the linear function <code><span class='Number'>1</span><span class='Modifier2'>⊸</span><span class='Function'>-</span></code>. However, it discards <a href="https://aplwiki.com/wiki/GCD">GCD</a> and <a href="https://aplwiki.com/wiki/LCM">LCM</a> as extensions of And and Or, and instead uses bilinear extensions: And is identical to Times (<code><span class='Function'>×</span></code>), while Or is <code><span class='Function'>×</span><span class='Modifier2'>⌾</span><span class='Function'>¬</span></code>, following De Morgan's laws (other ways of obtaining a function for Or give an equivalent result—there is only one bilinear extension).</p>
 <p>If the arguments are probabilities of independent events, then an extended function gives the probability of the boolean function on their outcomes (for example, if <em>A</em> occurs with probability <code><span class='Value'>a</span></code> and <em>B</em> with probability <code><span class='Value'>b</span></code> independent of <em>A</em>, then <em>A</em> or <em>B</em> occurs with probability <code><span class='Value'>a</span><span class='Function'>∨</span><span class='Value'>b</span></code>). These extensions have also been used in complexity theory, because they allow mathematicians to transfer a logical circuit from the discrete to the continuous domain in order to use calculus on it.</p>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3